You may have seen the recent comments by Wenda Millard dissing both Yahoo's and Google's huge, ongoing efforts to reinvent advertising for Web 2.0 and beyond. Wenda used to head Yahoo's ad sales efforts and is now president of media at Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. She chided both Yahoo and Google for a one-dimensional view of the future of advertising that's too focused on technology, at the expense of advertisers' business needs.
Advertising, she observed, is "not a business only of science. With the Google/DoubleClick combination, and the potential Microsoft/Yahoo combination, it’s like the scientific community is taking over the advertising business--and the ad business is not about algorithms.”
Google and Yahoo are key to the future of online advertising because they command such huge chunks of the online audience. Although many others are interested in evolving the advertising model, most lack the scale to get much traction in an industry where the changes they advocate will require a large redeployment of resources (MySpace could be an interesting exception).
In the last several weeks I've talked to some of the folks at both Google and Yahoo who are working on "Advertising 2.0" projects, so I can verify first-hand that both companies are taking the technology-first approach to their initiatives. The role of business people who understand the advertiser-agency dependency and bigger-picture brand advertising needs varies, but seems a bit higher profile in the Yahoo effort. Both companies, but especially Google, identify as technology businesses and want to present technology solutions.
In advertising this is an especially tricky aspiration. If the problem were straightforward to solve, online advertising advances would have kept pace with those of content and UI...yet they haven't. Online, technology is the sine qua non of innovation, but all the amazing technical possibilities need to be channeled into productive problem-solving and business models to bear fruit.
Part of the complexity comes from the necessary role of ad agencies. Looking at the industry from the 50,000 foot level, agencies seem ripe for disintermediation by more efficient technical solutions. But in reality, they have a vital role in the ecosystem. For media properties they simplify penetration; for advertisers, they open the door to technologies and products that many individual clients are too unsophisticated to utilize on their own. Agencies allow advertisers to outsource many technical complexities, and therefore are more valuable--not less--in the world of Advertising 2.0.
Also, a lot of activities occur under the "advertising" umbrella. Some, such as the straightforward lead generation represented by programs such as AdWords and Yahoo Search Marketing, are spectacularly suited to technology innovations. Others are trickier. Certainly technology can help with the accountability and measurability advertisers demand, but what about engagement? Are these new programs truly seeking to uncover and solve merchants' deepest needs from the media community, or are they aiming to optimize products that are actually flawed vestiges of a prior-day mindset--such as banner ads. The people I met with at Google and Yahoo seemed reluctant to innovate deeply enough. That's one reason I'm wondering whether MySpace and Facebook may end up eclipsing today's moonshot-level efforts to build the ultimate buggywhip.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment